▣The Last Decimal Open the partner account
paid
Affiliate disclosure. The partner link in the masthead and in the band beside the copy on this page is a sponsored link to a partner operator, and this site may be paid if you open an account through it, at no extra cost to you. It carries rel="sponsored noopener" and opens in a new tab. The subject of this desk is the fraction a rounding leaves behind - a figure that appears on no statement - so its own interest is stated here rather than left for a footer: one link funds the site, and no operator, market, currency, price or product is named, rated or recommended anywhere on it.
The Last Decimal / The eighth decimal
A unit smaller than the display

The eighth decimal: a unit below the display

When the unit of an account is smaller than the display, the fraction stops being an accident of rounding and becomes a permanent property of every balance. This page takes eight such accounts.

Sample spec
balances
8
decimals
8
with dust
5
largest dust
0.00499999
the unitThe smallest amount the currency can express. In a two-decimal currency it is 0.01; the increment a stake must take is coarser and published per market.
the directionWhich way each rounding goes: down on a stake and a return, up on a duty and down on a prize. It is a rule, published, and it decides who keeps the fraction.
the volumeOne unit per event is nothing once and a figure at scale: on the samples, two thousand events of the same size retain 60.00 from the digits alone.
Direct answer

In a currency with eight decimal places, the smallest unit is one hundred-millionth of a coin, far below the two places a balance is usually shown. On eight invented balances, five held a fraction smaller than the shown cent and the largest was 0.00499999, so the account held money the display could not express at all.

Eight balances, five with dust

The pattern is the balance page's disagreement with the sign reversed: where the unit is tiny, the fraction that cannot be shown is a permanent residue rather than a passing tail, and it sits in the account until something spends it or the account is closed.

Sample I - eight balances in an eight-decimal currency, shown to two places
HeldShownDustNote
0.125000000.130.00000000rounds up on display
1.000000011.000.00000001one unit of dust
2.349999992.350.00000001one unit short of the cent
0.004999990.000.00499999shown as nothing
10.0000000010.000.00000000exact
0.999999991.000.00000001a whole unit short
7.000000017.000.00000001one unit of dust
3.333333333.330.00000333a third repeated
8 balances-5 with dustmax 0.00499999
sample I - how much dust can hide the largest residue = 0.00499999 → shown to two places as 0.00 so an account holding it displays nothing at all, and the residue is smaller than half a cent: 0.00499999 ÷ 0.01 = 49.9999% of a cent. the smallest possible unit = 0.00000001, so a "full withdrawal" can leave up to one unit behind (0.00000001) - which the display renders as 0.00, indistinguishable from nothing.

What the display can and cannot say

Two points belong here and neither is a criticism of either currency. First, a coarse display is not a coarse account. An eight-decimal account shown to two places is storing fourteen digits that a reader never sees, and every one of them can be the difference between a withdrawal clearing and being refused, which is the balance page's finding stated without a fraction to blame. Second, dust is a residue, not a fee. It is money the account genuinely holds at a precision too small to spend in that currency's chosen display, and what happens to it at the end depends on the operator's closure rules rather than on arithmetic. The fiction worth discarding is that a balance shown as 0.00 is empty: on sample I it can hold 0.00499999, which is almost half a cent, at a precision the screen will never show.

Read next